<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Winners Never Cheat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leadonpurposeblog.com/2008/03/12/winners-never-cheat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leadonpurposeblog.com/2008/03/12/winners-never-cheat/</link>
	<description>Promoting Leadership Principles in Product Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:42:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ray Hopkin</title>
		<link>http://leadonpurposeblog.com/2008/03/12/winners-never-cheat/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ray Hopkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadonpurpose.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phil, I thought about the political landscape too as I was writing about this book. The landscape would no-doubt be much different if we as citizens required people running for office to pass the integrity test. We would have more leaders and far fewer celebrities.

Speaking of being tuned in, I&#039;m looking forward to reading/studying Tuned In and writing about it.

Thanks for your input.
Michael]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, I thought about the political landscape too as I was writing about this book. The landscape would no-doubt be much different if we as citizens required people running for office to pass the integrity test. We would have more leaders and far fewer celebrities.</p>
<p>Speaking of being tuned in, I&#8217;m looking forward to reading/studying Tuned In and writing about it.</p>
<p>Thanks for your input.<br />
Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Myers</title>
		<link>http://leadonpurposeblog.com/2008/03/12/winners-never-cheat/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Myers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadonpurpose.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice list of recommended reading you have going here Michael.  Like them all.  How appropriate that you&#039;ve got Winners Never Cheat posted with all that is going on in the news and political landscape the past month or so. The link between this and Good to Great are really starting to take hold. There is a new definition of leadership emerging and it starts with passing the integrity test. Being tuned in isn&#039;t bad either but then I&#039;m a little biased.  

Phil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice list of recommended reading you have going here Michael.  Like them all.  How appropriate that you&#8217;ve got Winners Never Cheat posted with all that is going on in the news and political landscape the past month or so. The link between this and Good to Great are really starting to take hold. There is a new definition of leadership emerging and it starts with passing the integrity test. Being tuned in isn&#8217;t bad either but then I&#8217;m a little biased.  </p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

