<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The plight of indecision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leadonpurposeblog.com/2009/02/24/the-plight-of-indecision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leadonpurposeblog.com/2009/02/24/the-plight-of-indecision/</link>
	<description>Promoting Leadership Principles in Product Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 21:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Rogers</title>
		<link>http://leadonpurposeblog.com/2009/02/24/the-plight-of-indecision/#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stewart Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadonpurposeblog.com/?p=626#comment-647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is danger in this, and I think you commented on it nicely, of rushing a decision.  Picking a choice without sufficient analysis can be equally dangerous. However, &#039;analysis paralysis&#039; can choke the moral out of an entire group.

I guess my takeaway is to understand your options, understand the timeline, understand what success and failure looks like and then work like a dog to satisfy your selection criteria for a decision.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is danger in this, and I think you commented on it nicely, of rushing a decision.  Picking a choice without sufficient analysis can be equally dangerous. However, &#8216;analysis paralysis&#8217; can choke the moral out of an entire group.</p>
<p>I guess my takeaway is to understand your options, understand the timeline, understand what success and failure looks like and then work like a dog to satisfy your selection criteria for a decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ray Hopkin</title>
		<link>http://leadonpurposeblog.com/2009/02/24/the-plight-of-indecision/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ray Hopkin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 02:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadonpurposeblog.com/?p=626#comment-637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jim - Nice contrast of indecision and confidence. Vacillation and hesitancy chip away at a person&#039;s confidence. Being decisive builds confidence. Being decisive does not guarantee you will always be right, but you will get to &quot;right&quot; much quicker and more efficiently.

@ David - I agree that decisions have an NPV and waiting costs more. Your comparison of a decision sitting around with an employee sitting around doing nothing really drives home the problem of not making decisions. The more we leave decisions &#039;loitering&#039; the more trouble we ask for.

Thanks for your comments. -Michael]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jim &#8211; Nice contrast of indecision and confidence. Vacillation and hesitancy chip away at a person&#8217;s confidence. Being decisive builds confidence. Being decisive does not guarantee you will always be right, but you will get to &#8220;right&#8221; much quicker and more efficiently.</p>
<p>@ David &#8211; I agree that decisions have an NPV and waiting costs more. Your comparison of a decision sitting around with an employee sitting around doing nothing really drives home the problem of not making decisions. The more we leave decisions &#8216;loitering&#8217; the more trouble we ask for.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. -Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Locke</title>
		<link>http://leadonpurposeblog.com/2009/02/24/the-plight-of-indecision/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Locke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadonpurposeblog.com/?p=626#comment-627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indecision is making the &quot;do nothing&quot; choice each day. When a pilot does that, we call it a crash. When a manager does that they say &quot;Europe was soft this quarter.&quot;

Indecision is accepting the cost of abating the problem, or accepting the loss of the revenue that the decision faced. Either way, the real outcome of indecision isn&#039;t straight and normal flight, or growth. The real outcome is down, and down faster. &quot;Are we vertical yet?&quot;

A guy I worked with told me that if he didn&#039;t make the decision, his boss would eat him alive. It didn&#039;t matter if he made a good or bad decision, as long as it was made and committed to.

Time shapes all decisions. Time shapes all costs. If you practice cost management, then you have to make that decision immediately. A decision has an NPV. Waiting costs more and earns less. Waiting multiplies the downside. 

If an employee sits at their desk all day doing nothing, most managers wouldn&#039;t tolerate it. So why is it we tolerate decisions sitting at our desk doing nothing for days, months, quarters, years and years on end? 

&quot;Hey, you, decision 423, clean out your desk, you&#039;re fired!&quot; Get security. Decisions tend to loiter on the way out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indecision is making the &#8220;do nothing&#8221; choice each day. When a pilot does that, we call it a crash. When a manager does that they say &#8220;Europe was soft this quarter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indecision is accepting the cost of abating the problem, or accepting the loss of the revenue that the decision faced. Either way, the real outcome of indecision isn&#8217;t straight and normal flight, or growth. The real outcome is down, and down faster. &#8220;Are we vertical yet?&#8221;</p>
<p>A guy I worked with told me that if he didn&#8217;t make the decision, his boss would eat him alive. It didn&#8217;t matter if he made a good or bad decision, as long as it was made and committed to.</p>
<p>Time shapes all decisions. Time shapes all costs. If you practice cost management, then you have to make that decision immediately. A decision has an NPV. Waiting costs more and earns less. Waiting multiplies the downside. </p>
<p>If an employee sits at their desk all day doing nothing, most managers wouldn&#8217;t tolerate it. So why is it we tolerate decisions sitting at our desk doing nothing for days, months, quarters, years and years on end? </p>
<p>&#8220;Hey, you, decision 423, clean out your desk, you&#8217;re fired!&#8221; Get security. Decisions tend to loiter on the way out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Holland</title>
		<link>http://leadonpurposeblog.com/2009/02/24/the-plight-of-indecision/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Holland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadonpurposeblog.com/?p=626#comment-624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t agree more. &quot;Shoulda, woulda, coulda&quot; has been the death of more products. If you use a repeatable method founded on market fact and real evidence, then the indecisions will start to disappear and confidence emerge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more. &#8220;Shoulda, woulda, coulda&#8221; has been the death of more products. If you use a repeatable method founded on market fact and real evidence, then the indecisions will start to disappear and confidence emerge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

